Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PeerJ Computer Scien...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PeerJ Computer Science
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2025
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Optimizing lexical fitness assessment in L2 Chinese reading texts

Authors: Qiao Lin; Hua Liu;

Optimizing lexical fitness assessment in L2 Chinese reading texts

Abstract

Background Vocabulary serves as the foundation for text comprehension. Therefore, texts at different proficiency levels should incorporate appropriately adapted vocabulary to support second language learners in developing their reading skills. Methods To objectively quantify the grading process of L2 Chinese (Chinese for a Second Language) reading texts, we designed a text classification experiment grounded in lexical fitness evaluation. This study employs a comparative framework, pitting a classical machine learning classification model against a neural network-based classification model incorporating a multi-head attention mechanism. The experimental results demonstrate that the rule-based lexical feature extraction method achieves optimal performance under the random forest (RF) classification model, attaining an F1-score of 0.879. To further optimize and streamline the classification process, we identified 22 optimal feature sets based on mutual information (MI) rankings of lexical features, incorporating novel features introduced in this study. Results A comparative analysis with prior work underscores the superiority of our lexical feature construction framework. Crucially, the assessment of lexical form, lexical meaning, and lexical syntax, as well as their interactions across different textual levels, exhibits significant variability. Optimal evaluation can only be achieved through a holistic integration of all three dimensions.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold