
doi: 10.7557/14.3716
handle: 10642/2896
It is required that faculty in nursing education prepares students to work evidence-based (EBP). The purposes of this study are to identify teachers’ beliefs towards EBP and to describe what the faculty identify as their specific learning needs to teach EBP. Data were collected from teachers at a University College in Norway by use of questionnaires and focus group interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the questionnaires and thematic content analysis for the focus group interviews. The teachers have positive beliefs towards EBP and their central learning needs were searching the literature, critical appraisal and application. They have knowledge in basic methodology, but need more knowledge of epidemiological and summarized research. Teaching and training in all six stages of EBP is important for teachers to develop their knowledge of EBP. Qualitative and quantitative methods in combination, works well to identify teachers’ specific needs for new knowledge.
faculty, sykepleierutdanning Evidence-based practice, nursing education, RT1-120, lærere, Nursing, Evidence-based practice, sykepleierutdanning, kartlegging, VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808, focus groups, survey, kunnskapsbasert praksis, Fokusgrupper
faculty, sykepleierutdanning Evidence-based practice, nursing education, RT1-120, lærere, Nursing, Evidence-based practice, sykepleierutdanning, kartlegging, VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808, focus groups, survey, kunnskapsbasert praksis, Fokusgrupper
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
