
doi: 10.7227/jbr.11.7
This article argues that Giovanni’s Room can be read as James Baldwin’s response to European existentialist thought, particularly regarding their differing views of self-transformation and the pivotal role of the sexually desiring body in this process. Comparing Baldwin’s novel to Albert Camus’s The Stranger and to Jean-Paul Sartre’s Being and Nothingness, the article identifies three key divergences. First, Baldwin shifts the narrative focus from the condemned man to his lover, revealing the limits of existentialist philosophy’s individualist focus. Second, Baldwin challenges existentialism’s characteristic pessimism by portraying the capacity to overcome shame and self-deception—Sartrean “bad faith”—to pursue a more authentic existence. Third, Baldwin underscores the desiring body’s role in this transformation. By exploring these three dimensions, the article contributes to the ongoing effort to recognize in Baldwin not only an artist and a keen political commentator but also a deeply philosophical thinker.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
