
arXiv: 1306.0542
The aim of this paper is to study the Stanley depth of symbolic powers of a squarefree monomial ideal. We prove that for every squarefree monomial ideal $I$ and every pair of integers $k, s\geq 1$, the inequalities $\mathrm{sdepth} (S/I^{(ks)}) \leq \mathrm{sdepth} (S/I^{(s)})$ and $\mathrm{sdepth}(I^{(ks)}) \leq \mathrm{sdepth} (I^{(s)})$ hold. If moreover $I$ is unmixed of height $d$, then we show that for every integer $k\geq1$, $\mathrm{sdepth}(I^{(k+d)})\leq \mathrm{sdepth}(I^{{(k)}})$ and $\mathrm{sdepth}(S/I^{(k+d)})\leq \mathrm{sdepth}(S/I^{{(k)}})$. Finally, we consider the limit behavior of the Stanley depth of symbolic powers of a squarefree monomial ideal. We also introduce a method for comparing the Stanley depth of factors of monomial ideals.
Dimension theory, depth, related commutative rings (catenary, etc.), monomial ideal, symbolic power, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Combinatorics (math.CO), Mathematics - Commutative Algebra, Commutative Algebra (math.AC), Stanley depth
Dimension theory, depth, related commutative rings (catenary, etc.), monomial ideal, symbolic power, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Combinatorics (math.CO), Mathematics - Commutative Algebra, Commutative Algebra (math.AC), Stanley depth
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
