Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Validation of the Humor Styles Questionnaire: Correspondence between Humor Styles and Ratings of Specific Types of Jokes and the Effect of Participants' Social Settings on the Humor Style Preference

Authors: Sossi Berberian;

Validation of the Humor Styles Questionnaire: Correspondence between Humor Styles and Ratings of Specific Types of Jokes and the Effect of Participants' Social Settings on the Humor Style Preference

Abstract

The current study examined the validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) within the Lebanese society. The following hypotheses were tested: (1) Individuals' ratings of their style of humor on the HSQ correlates with the degree to which they liked the corresponding type of Lebanese culture-specific Abu el Abed jokes, and the likelihood of them telling the jokes to others. (2) The humor style ratings of Lebanese participants on a modified Humor Styles Questionnaire would differ depending on whether the statements referred to friends or to family members separately. Obtained results supported hypothesis one for the most part: individuals' scores on the HSQ correlated with the degree to which they liked the corresponding type of Abu el Abed jokes, for all three dimensions of humor: affiliative, self-enhancing, and hostile, but not the self-defeating style. On the other hand, correlations were significant for individuals' ratings on the HSQ and the likelihood of them telling the corresponding type of jokes to others for all four dimensions of humor: affiliative, self-enhancing, hostile, and self-defeating. Results offered partial support for hypothesis two, in that depending on whether the statements referred to friends or to family members, individuals' humor style rating differed significantly for the affiliative and self-enhancing, but not for the hostile and self-defeating style of humor. Results were interpreted in terms of findings reached in Martin et al.'s development and initial validation of the HSQ, as well as in terms of differences between individualist and collectivist cultures.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!