Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Sanitas Revista arbi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Sanitas Revista arbitrada de ciencias de la salud
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Placa bacteriana entre estudiantes rurales y urbanos [Bacterial plaque among rural and urban students]

Authors: Diana Denisse Criollo-Chamorro; Dayanara Scarleth Chicaiza-Hurtado; Karina Madelaine Sarzosa-Romo; Lilian Margoth Paspuezan-Pérez;

Placa bacteriana entre estudiantes rurales y urbanos [Bacterial plaque among rural and urban students]

Abstract

Objetivo: analizar el índice de placa bacteriana entre estudiantes rurales y urbanos. Método: Descriptiva observacional. Resultados y Conclusión: El análisis de la higiene oral en contextos rurales y urbanos reveló diferencias significativas: en el ámbito rural, las mujeres presentaron un 33,33% de placa bacteriana aceptable, cuestionable y deficiente por igual, mientras que los hombres alcanzaron un 67% de niveles aceptables, aunque un 25% mostró deficiencias, lo que evidencia una falta de intervenciones educativas específicas. En el contexto urbano, las niñas lograron un 39,1% de placa aceptable, pero un 33,56% presentó niveles deficientes, mientras que los niños alcanzaron un 40% de niveles aceptables, con un 30% en niveles cuestionables y deficientes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold