Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Estrategias metacognitivas y pensamiento crítico en docentes

الاستراتيجيات ما وراء المعرفية والتفكير النقدي لدى المعلمين
Authors: Luis F. Santana; Betsy Janeth Bravo Cedeño; César Balladares Atoche; Cristina Verónica Gordon Torres; María de Lourdes Preciado; Cristhian Raymundo Mendoza Quito;

Estrategias metacognitivas y pensamiento crítico en docentes

Abstract

Cet article avait pour but d'analyser le niveau de la pensée critique des enseignants pour la présentation d'une proposition d'amélioration, l'étude a été présentée comme un type descriptif – propositionnel, conception non expérimentale, avec une population de 100 enseignants de l'établissement d'enseignement, un questionnaire de 23 questions a été élaboré comme instrument, appliqué au moyen d'une enquête. Les résultats ont indiqué que la pensée critique est appliquée par la plupart des enseignants au niveau régulier et bon, pour la dimension logique 98 % aux niveaux régulier et bon, pour la dimension substantielle 96 % au niveau régulier et bon, pour la dimension dialogique 100 % au niveau régulier et bon ; pour la dimension contextuelle 90 % au niveau régulier et bon, pour la dimension pragmatique 98 % au niveau régulier et bon, pour la variable pensée critique 97 % au niveau régulier et bon. Avec ces résultats, la proposition et les stratégies métacognitives ont été élaborées afin d'améliorer la pensée critique du personnel enseignant.

El presente artículo ha tenido como finalidad el análisis del nivel del pensamiento crítico de los docentes para la presentación de una propuesta de mejora, el estudio ha sido planteada como tipo descriptiva – propositiva, diseño no experimental, con una población de 100 docentes de la institución educativa, se elaboró como instrumento un cuestionario de 23 preguntas, aplicándose mediante una encuesta. Los resultados indicaron que el pensamiento crítico es aplicado por la mayoría de docentes en el nivel regular y bueno, para la dimensión lógica el 98% en niveles de regular y bueno, para la dimensión sustantiva el 96% en regular y bueno, para la dimensión dialógica el 100% en regular y bueno; para la dimensión contextual el 90% regular y bueno, para la dimensión pragmática el 98% en regular y bueno, para la variable pensamiento crítico el 97% regular y bueno. Con estos resultados se ha elaborado la propuesta e estrategias metacognitivas con el fin de en busca de mejorar el pensamiento crítico del personal docente.

The purpose of this article has been to analyze the level of critical thinking of teachers for the presentation of a proposal for improvement. The study has been proposed as a descriptive – proactive type, non-experimental design, with a population of 100 teachers from the educational institution. A questionnaire of 23 questions was developed as an instrument, applied through a survey. The results indicated that critical thinking is applied by the majority of teachers at the regular and good level, for the logical dimension 98% at regular and good levels, for the substantive dimension 96% at regular and good, for the dialogical dimension 100% at regular and good; for the contextual dimension 90% at regular and good, for the pragmatic dimension 98% at regular and good, for the variable critical thinking 97% at regular and good. With these results, the proposal and metacognitive strategies have been developed in order to seek to improve the critical thinking of teaching staff.

كان الغرض من هذه المقالة هو تحليل مستوى التفكير النقدي للمعلمين لتقديم اقتراح للتحسين، وقد تم اقتراح الدراسة كنوع وصفي – استباقي، تصميم غير تجريبي، يبلغ عدد سكانها 100 معلم من المؤسسة التعليمية، وتم تطوير استبيان من 23 سؤال كأداة، تم تطبيقه من خلال استبيان. أشارت النتائج إلى أن التفكير النقدي يتم تطبيقه من قبل غالبية المعلمين على المستوى العادي والجيد، للبعد المنطقي 98 ٪ على المستويات العادية والجيدة، للبعد الموضوعي 96 ٪ على المستوى العادي والجيد، للبعد الحواري 100 ٪ على المستوى العادي والجيد ؛ للبعد السياقي 90 ٪ على المستوى العادي والجيد، للبعد العملي 98 ٪ على المستوى العادي والجيد، للتفكير النقدي المتغير 97 ٪ على المستوى العادي والجيد. مع هذه النتائج، تم تطوير الاقتراح والاستراتيجيات ما وراء المعرفية من أجل السعي إلى تحسين التفكير النقدي لأعضاء هيئة التدريس.

Keywords

FOS: Computer and information sciences, Educational Leadership and Quality in Education, Pedagogical Leadership, Physics, Epistemological Foundations of Mixed Methods Research, Social Sciences, Impact of Information and Communication Technology in Education, FOS: Humanities, Education, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Humanities, Philosophy, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Safety Research, Information Systems

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!