Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Stakeholder Perspectives on Implementing Menu Labeling in a Cafeteria Setting

Authors: Lana, Vanderlee; Michelle M, Vine; Nancy E, Fenton; David, Hammond;

Stakeholder Perspectives on Implementing Menu Labeling in a Cafeteria Setting

Abstract

Mandatory and voluntary menu-labeling policies are increasingly common to support informed food choices among consumers. This study sought to examine stakeholder perspectives of developing, implementing, and maintaining a voluntary menu-labeling program in a hospital cafeteria setting.Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 9 key cafeteria stakeholders. Data were coded by 2 independent researchers. Themes were generated deductively around 4 key themes: (1) motivation for the program; (2) program and menu development; (3) program implementation process; and, (4) "lessons learned," and inductively as they emerged from interview transcripts. These themes were mapped onto Damschroder's Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Motivations for the program were both internal and external to enable consumers to make educated food choices. Barriers to implementation included financial resources, digital menu board maintenance, and availability of healthy options from providers. Supports included availability of nutritional analysis software and nutritional information, and controlled food preparation. Ownership, program adaptation, a supportive collegial environment, a program champion and a culture valuing healthy eating were conducive to successful implementation.Both internal and external factors can support the voluntary implementation of menu-labeling programs.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Restaurants, Pilot Projects, Nutrition Policy, Food Preferences, Menu Planning, Food Service, Hospital, Humans, Female, Qualitative Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!