
Basic education plays a central role in character building and preparing individuals for the future. To achieve optimal goals, the policy and management system of education (Pendas) must be analysed in depth. This study uses a qualitative method with a library study approach to evaluate the pros and cons of the Pendas policy system and Pendas management system. Content analysis of relevant literature revealed that the Pendas policy system provides clarity of national vision and educational inclusion, although it is prone to bureaucracy and slow in adaptation. On the other hand, the Pendas management system offers local adaptability and active participation, but may face inter-agency coordination challenges. This study provides in-depth insights into critical components such as curriculum policy, human resource management and education evaluation and highlights the need for integrative strategies to strengthen an inclusive and competitive education system.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
