
doi: 10.58680/vm201220693
The authors examined the strength of literature circles in developing background knowledge an acknowledged sticking point in the development of understanding for middle graders with a special focus on the literature circle role of investigator, where it is student initiative and not teacher direction that guides comprehension. Observing students who were reading Maniac Magee with a teacher who supported reading in literature circles, the authors concluded that being an investigator allowed students to personally learn about topics, words, and people that were important to understanding the novel, and that by treating the novel as a puzzle to solve, they developed an appreciation for the authors research and skill, broadened their own background knowledge, routinely listened and responded to others in their circle, and developed as critical readers. An added bonus was the development of a homeschool dialogue.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
