
A major task in planning the computer science curriculum is the specification of teaching and learning contents. This work needs to be based on knowledge of the content and process concepts central to the discipline of computer science. These central concepts are applicable or observable in multiple domains of computer science, can be taught on every intellectual level, will be relevant in the longer term, and are related to everyday language and/or thinking. Two empirically based catalogues of central content concepts (e.g., algorithm, system, process) and central process concepts (e.g., problem solving and problem posing, analyzing, classifying) for computer science education have recently been proposed. This article uses discriminant analysis techniques to provide a semantic categorization of both the content and the process concepts. On this basis, conclusions can be drawn about how individual groups of content and process concepts differ semantically.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
