I begin with a brief examination of early, subjunctive, formulations of conditions of reasonable epistemic access. I then turn my attention to Bayesian formulations. I suggest that, because of the many difficulties that attend Bayesian theorizing, it is worth considering an alternative framework for discussion of the relevant considerations. I argue that my favored alternative framework supports the general conclusion of Lara Buchak: we should not be quick to assume that, if naive theism is a failure, skeptical theism is somehow tarnished by that failure.