Response to “Mere Theistic Evolution”

William Lane Craig

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Philosophia Christiarrow_drop_down

Philosophia Christi

Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed

Data sources: Crossref

https://dx.doi.org/10.5840/pc2...

Other literature type

Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph

Response to “Mere Theistic Evolution”

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 01 Jan 2020Publisher:Philosophy Documentation CenterJournal:Philosophia Christi, volume 22, pages 55-61 (issn: 1529-1634,

Copyright policy )

Authors: William Lane Craig;

doi: 10.5840/pc20202214

Response to “Mere Theistic Evolution”

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Murray and Churchill argue correctly that theistic evolution as they define it is theologically compatible with orthodox Christian doctrines concerning divine providence, natural theology, miracles, and immaterial souls. I close with some reflections on mutual misunderstandings of Intelligent Design proponents and theistic evolutionists that arise because each sees the other as a distorted mirror image of himself.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	2
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average