Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ JOURNAL OF DENTAL HE...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
JOURNAL OF DENTAL HEALTH
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Factors Influencing Masticatory Ability in Adults.

成人のそしゃく能力に及ぼす要因について
Authors: Masatoshi YANO; Yuichi ANDO; Seigo KOBAYASHI; Kin-ichi HORII; Kazuo ISHIGAMI; Yoshihiko NAGASE; Takeshi SASAKI;

Factors Influencing Masticatory Ability in Adults.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of factors influencing masticatory ability in adults. We examined adults from 18 to 86 years of age living in Yasuda Town, Niigata Prefecture. For subjective assessment of masticatory ability, we obtained data from 336 subjects about the food group in which subjects could chew all foods well, using the assessment chart of masticatory efficiency developed by Yamamoto. For objective assessment of masticatory ability, the amount of sugar elution from a piece of chewing gum was measured in 252 subjects who chewed the gum 100 times. In these assessments, subjects who ordinarily used dentures were tested without dentures.A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed using 10 independent variables when explaining the food group in which subjects could chew all foods well, and using 11 independent variables when explaining the amounts of sugar elution.The results showed that the 5 statistically significant variables of the food group in which subjects could chew all foods well, listed in order of the values of the standardized partial regression coefficient were: ‘Number of missing teeth’, -0.671; ‘Using dentures ordinarily’, -0.182; ‘Knowlege of one's own general health’, -0.103; ‘Having jaw or oral pain excluding toothaches’, -0.081; and ‘Having loose teeth’, -0.061 (multiple correlation coefficient R=0.833, p<0.001). The 2 statistically significant variables of the amounts of sugar elution were: ‘Number of missing teeth’, -0.722; and ‘Amount of time required to chew a piece of gum 100 times’, 0.260 (multiple correlation coefficient R=0.668, p<0.001).It was concluded that the number of missing teeth was the factor with the highest standardized partial regression coefficient influencing masticatory ability both in subjective and objective assessments.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
bronze