
doi: 10.5802/crmath.317
A review of stable boundary integral equation methods for solving the Navier equation with either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions in the exterior of a Lipschitz domain is presented. The conventional combined-field integral equation (CFIE) formulations, that are used to avoid spurious resonances, do not give rise to a coercive variational formulation for nonsmooth geometries anymore. To circumvent this issue, either the single layer or the double layer potential operator is composed with a compact or a Steklov–Poincaré type operator. The later can be constructed from the well-know elliptic boundary integral operators associated to the Laplace equation and Gårding’s inequalities are satisfied. Some Neumann interior eigenvalue computations for the unit square and cube are presented for forthcoming numerical investigations.
Gårding’s inequality, Integral representations of solutions to PDEs, linear elasticity, eigenvalues, Eigenvalues, Stability and convergence of numerical methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Boundary integral equation, Boundary value problems for second-order elliptic equations, Gårding's inequality, Classical linear elasticity, Lipschitz domains, QA1-939, Scattering theory for PDEs, boundary integral equation, Linear elasticity, Mathematics
Gårding’s inequality, Integral representations of solutions to PDEs, linear elasticity, eigenvalues, Eigenvalues, Stability and convergence of numerical methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Boundary integral equation, Boundary value problems for second-order elliptic equations, Gårding's inequality, Classical linear elasticity, Lipschitz domains, QA1-939, Scattering theory for PDEs, boundary integral equation, Linear elasticity, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
