
arXiv: 1711.05012
In this article, we study the excursion sets đ p = f - 1 ( [ - p , + â [ ) where f is a natural real-analytic planar Gaussian field called the BargmannâFock field. More precisely, f is the centered Gaussian field on â 2 with covariance ( x , y ) ⊠exp ( - 1 2 | x - y | 2 ) . Alexander has proved that, if p †0 , then a.s. đ p has no unbounded component. We show that conversely, if p > 0 , then a.s. đ p has a unique unbounded component. As a result, the critical level of this percolation model is 0 . We also prove exponential decay of crossing probabilities under the critical level. To show these results, we rely on a recent box-crossing estimate by Beffara and Gayet. We also develop several tools including a KKL-type result for biased Gaussian vectors (based on the analogous result for product Gaussian vectors by Keller, Mossel and Sen) and a sprinkling inspired discretization procedure. These intermediate results hold for more general Gaussian fields, for which we prove a discrete version of our main result.
percolation, sharp threshold, Probability (math.PR), KKL, FOS: Mathematics, Gaussian processes, critical point, Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory, Geometric probability and stochastic geometry, Bargmann-Fock field, Mathematics - Probability
percolation, sharp threshold, Probability (math.PR), KKL, FOS: Mathematics, Gaussian processes, critical point, Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory, Geometric probability and stochastic geometry, Bargmann-Fock field, Mathematics - Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
