
arXiv: 1612.06967
Does the asymptotic variance of the maximum composite likelihood estimator of a parameter of interest always decrease when the nuisance parameters are known? Will a composite likelihood necessarily become more efficient by incorporating addi- tional independent component likelihoods, or by using component likelihoods with higher dimension? In this note we show through illustrative examples that the an- swer to both questions is no, and indeed the opposite direction might be observed. The role of information bias is highlighted to understand the occurrence of these paradoxical phenomenon.
nuisance parameter, Statistics, estimating function, godambe information matrix, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Statistics Theory (math.ST), Bartlett's second identity, pairwise likelihood
nuisance parameter, Statistics, estimating function, godambe information matrix, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Statistics Theory (math.ST), Bartlett's second identity, pairwise likelihood
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
