
doi: 10.56369/tsaes.3499
<p><strong>Background. </strong>Evaluate the nutritional quality of forages is fundamental and to do different techniques are used including <em>in vitro</em> gas production. <strong>Objetive. </strong>In this paper, gas production technique was used to estimate <em>in vitro </em>digestibility and fermentation kinetics in <em>Avena strigosa</em>. <strong>Methodology.</strong> The work consisted of two experiments, in experiment 1, forage composed of black oat regrowth (AN) and black oat regrowth associated with red clover (ANT) was compared with a multi-species of temperate pastures (PME). In experiment 2, black oat silage (EAN) was evaluated in comparison to two multi-species grasslands composed of temperate climate grasses (PME-1 and PME-2). <strong>Results. </strong>In experiment 1 the PC content was different (P <0.05). The estimated digestibility and metabolizable energy of gas production were not different (P> 0.05). In vitro gas production was not different (P> 0.05) for any of the variables. In experiment 2, differences (P <0.05) were observed in the contents of CP, NDF, ADF, however, the digestibilities and metabolizable energy were not different (P> 0.05). Regarding <em>in vitro</em> gas production, there were no differences (P> 0.05) in any of the evaluated parameters (soluble fraction (A), fermentation rate of fraction A (C1); slow fermentation fraction (B); rate fermentation time of fraction B (C2) and fermentation time of fraction B (<em>lag</em>). <strong>Implications. </strong>The results of this study allow us to know the best way the nutritional assessment of black oats. <strong>Conclusions. </strong>It is concluded that the forage of the oat regrowth has a different behaviour since it has more slowly fermentable carbohydrates compared to the forage composed of temperate grasses (experiment 1). In experiment 2, the compound temperate forage grasses and oats silage similar nutritional value was similar.</p>
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
