Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Forestry Chronic...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Forestry Chronicle
Article . 1981 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

How Seedbed Density Can Affect Nursery Stock Costs

Authors: A. Wynia; K. M. McClain;

How Seedbed Density Can Affect Nursery Stock Costs

Abstract

Controlling seedbed density is a practical and dependable method to regulate seedling morphology but low densities significantly affect nursery stock production costs. How production costs are affected by seedbed density with particular reference to the grading operation is examined. After the spring lift 3 + 0 black spruce which were raised at three seedbed densities were graded to achieve medium size stock with cull trees being further classified according to defect. Lowest cull was recorded for medium density seedlings at 31% followed by the high and low density treatment at 34.2% and 39.5% respectively. Total variable costs of production associated with the low, medium and high densities were $83.83, $47.10 and $31.19 per M. respectively. It is concluded that the greater costs of growing seedlings at low seedbed densities must be balanced against plant performance, otherwise there is little incentive for low density production.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
gold