
Pharmaceutical formulations are experiencing a significant transformation as novel drug delivery techniques become increasingly available and effective. While there are many different types of medical dosage forms, each has its own limitations, such as tablet choking and painful parenteral dosages. Buccal drug delivery, which involves administering medication to the oral cavity, offers a convenient and easy-to-administer alternative. The oral route of medication administration has numerous benefits, including avoiding liver metabolism, enhancing drug bioavailability, and improving the onset of action. By directly entering the systemic circulation, active pharmaceutical ingredients can produce their therapeutic effects. As the buccal mucosa has a high degree of permeability and blood supply, it is a highly accessible drug delivery system. There are six theories that explain mucosal adhesion: electronics, wettability, adsorption, degradation, diffusion, and mechanics. Various in vitro and in vivo approaches have been used to study buccal drug delivery systems. This paper discusses the mechanisms of action, mucosal adhesion theories, and standard techniques for producing films. Key areas of study in buccal drug delivery systems include evaluating films for weight variation, thickness, folding endurance, surface pH, percentage of moisture absorption and loss, tensile strength, swelling index, content uniformity, and in vitro permeation studies.
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
