Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Pamukkale Tıp Dergis...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Patients' Satisfaction at Tertiary Care

Authors: Didem Tezcan; Mehmet Hakan Yucel; Umut Burak Unal; Tamer Edirne;

Patients' Satisfaction at Tertiary Care

Abstract

Purpose: Assessing quality and efficacy in health care services through patients’ satisfaction questionnaires is a method reflecting patients’ opinions. This study aims to investigate patients’ satisfaction status at a tertiary health facility. Materials and methods: This study was conducted from May to June 2013 at the Pamukkale University Hospital including 102 patients. A questionnaire, prepared after literature research and discussions among authors, was used. The questionnaire consisted of two parts containing 7 and 14 items. The first part included demographical items and the second part included the patients’ satisfaction status. Patients in the waiting rooms were asked to participate in the questionnaire and a face-to-face method was used after acceptance. The questionnaire took approximately 4 minutes to complete and the names of patients were not required. Results: In the majority (78.4%), patients were satisfied with the health care services. 73.5% of the patients noted that the consulting physician listened carefully to them. 70.6% stated that they were not able to choose the physician and 59.8% stated that they were not able to see a physician in 15 minutes. Adverse effects of medication prescribed were not mentioned in 66.7% of the consultations. Conclusion: Factors effecting satisfaction status positively were caring and time sparing physician, cleanliness and comfort of the environment, polite and respectful care, respect for intimacy and informative care. Sex, educational level and income were not effective on patients’ satisfaction status. The preference for a physician, counselling about drug adverse effects and consultation waiting times were not related to satisfaction levels. The need for further research into patients’ satisfaction is obvious. Pam Med J 2014;7(1):57-62

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
bronze