
doi: 10.54940/ll72765376
Superlative types are vary between literary, morphological and linguistic types, as well as the techniques used by the Semitic languages in expressing them are vary too ,and techniques here means the styles and structures used by Semitic languages to express superlative adjectives, this research aims to identify these techniques in three Semitic languages (Ge’ez, Hebrew and Arabic). In order to understand these techniques & identify them, this research begin with an introduction identifies terms related to superlative term. Then the research study the techniques of superlative adjectives in Ge'ez language. Then the techniques of superlative adjectives in Hebrew. Finally, the techniques of Arabic language in expression of superlative adjectives, followed by the most important differences and similarities between the three Semitic languages techniques, and then conclude the search results followed by a list of sources and references on which the research relied. This research use the descriptive comparative methodology. The most important findings of the research: - The three languages are similar in the use of morphological forms, and this is clear in Arabic and Ge'ez, while the Hebrew has one unused lexical form. Both Ge'ez and Hebrew are similar in the use of adjective intensifiers to express morphological superlative, as well as the use of certain prepositions to express superlative formulas. Ge'ez language differs from Hebrew and Arabic in its use of cognate accusative to express superlative adjectives.
Language and Literature, P
Language and Literature, P
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
