
We study possible motivations for co-entreprenurial couples to start up a joint firm, using a sample of 1,069 Danish couples that established a joint enterprise between 2001 and 2010. We compare their pre-entry characteristics, firm performance and post-dissolution private and financial outcomes with a selected set of comparable firms and couples. We find evidence that couples often establish a business together because one spouse – most commonly the female – has limited outside opportunities in the labor market. However, the financial benefits for each of the spouses, and especially the female, are larger in co-entrepreneurial firms, both during the life of the business and post-dissolution. The start-up of co-entrepreneurial firms seems therefore a sound investment in the human capital of both spouses as well as in the reduction of income inequality in the household. We find no evidence of non-pecuniary benefits or costs of co-entrepreneurship.
couples, 330, L26, ddc:330, Performance, J12, Entrepreneurship, Couples, entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship, motives, performance, couples, co-entrepreneurship., co-entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, motives, performance, couples, co-entrepreneurship, motives, Motives, co-entrepreneurship., performance, Co-entrepreneurship, jel: jel:J12, jel: jel:L26
couples, 330, L26, ddc:330, Performance, J12, Entrepreneurship, Couples, entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship, motives, performance, couples, co-entrepreneurship., co-entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, motives, performance, couples, co-entrepreneurship, motives, Motives, co-entrepreneurship., performance, Co-entrepreneurship, jel: jel:J12, jel: jel:L26
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
