Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Anatolian Journal of...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry
Article
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) Long and Short Turkish Forms

Authors: Arkun Tatar;

Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) Long and Short Turkish Forms

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) 100 item long (HEXACO-PI-R-100-Tr) and 60 item short HEXACO-PI-R-60-Tr) Turkish forms. Methods: A total of 1174 people, 682 women and 492 men, between the ages of 18 and 73 participated in the study. The Five Factor Personality Inventory long form was administered to assess convergent validity. Of all participants 1118 people answered both inventories. Of participants 55 people completed the HEXACO-PI-Tr again after an interval of 15 days for test retest comparison. Results: The long form showed internal-consistency reliabilities ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 for six factors and from 0.29 to 0.77 for 24 subdimensions, for the short form internal- consistency reliabilities for six factors ranged from 0.58 to 0.75. Results of test retest analysis of the factors revealed correlation coefficients ranging from 0.67 to 0.80 for the long form and from 0.54 to 0.81 for the short form. Six factor construct of the inventory accounted for 27.76% of the variance in the long form and for 30.24% of the variance in the short form. Correlation coefficients as similarity measures between the factors of short and long forms were 0.92 for honesty-humility, 0.91 for extraversion, 0.94 for emotionality, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness to experience. Convergence validity correlation coefficients between factors of the HEXACO-PI-100-Tr and factors of the Five Factor Personality Inventory ranged from 0.46 to 0.73 for the long form and from 0.45 to 0.66 for the short form. Discussion: The results show that the Turkish form of the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R-Tr), both long and short forms, carry basic psychometric properties for practical uses and both forms show quite similar properties with the original English version.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
hybrid