
Qaytbay (r. 1468-96) and Qansuh al-Ghawri (r. 1501-16), the two most prominent Sultans of the late Circassian Mamluk period, donated substantial properties such as agricultural lands, houses, caravansaries, public baths, etc. as Waqfs (religious endowments). C. F. Petry regards their activities as a “financial policy” intended to secure a private source of revenue independent of the traditional state financial system against the political and economic crises of the times. However, it must be noted that the preceding Sultans had also striven to hold private and Waqf properties. It is necessary to comprehend the meaning of their “financial policy” from the point of view of the historical development of the Sultan's private financial affairs. It seems that the Sultans developed their own resources because of practical necessity due to fundamental problems of the state and the political structure in this period.From this aspect, this paper examines the process by which Barquq, the first Sultan of the Circassian Mamluks (r. 1382-89, 90-99), accumulated property and its background, using narrative and archival sources. Consequently, the following facts have become clear: firstly, Barquq held various kinds of private and Waqf properties, and thus the Diwan al-Amldk wal-Awqaf wal-Dhakhira, the special office having charge of them, headed by an Ustadar, was established; secondly, holding those properties was helpful for him in operating a government in the midst of political instability and the malfunction of the traditional state machinery; thirdly, he accumulated the properties by both fair means and foul, such as the diversion of state propery, confiscation, the Istibdal (exchange of Waqf properties) etc. Subsequently, the role of the Sultan's property in the political and financial spheres grew in importance throughout the Circassian Mamluk period.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
