
doi: 10.5282/rcc/6193
Whose diversity should be valued in a situation where the coexistence of certain species is disharmonious and conflict-ridden? Should cultural or biological endurance be secured in conservation contexts, where managing interspecies relationships depends on the policing of strict boundaries between humans and “wilderness”? Whom should we privilege when the survival of highly endangered (and dangerous) species seemingly depends on the creation of human-free spaces? This article engages with such questions by focusing on the Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary of Kerala in southern India, arguing that a reconceptualization of both “culture” and “nature” will be necessary in order to prevent the concept of biocultural diversity from appearing as just another form of “green neocolonization” or “eco-imperialism.”
colonialism, biology, wilderness, conservation, Biodiversity
colonialism, biology, wilderness, conservation, Biodiversity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
