Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Chrysogorgiidae

Authors: Cordeiro, Ralf T. S.; Castro, Clovis B.; Pérez, Carlos D.;

Chrysogorgiidae

Abstract

KEY TO SPECIES OF THE FAMILY CHRYSOGORGIIDAE OF BRAZIL 1 Colonies branched.............................................................................. 2 1’ Colonies unbranched.......................................... Radicipes kopelatos sp. nov. (Fig. 2 H, 6, 9) 2 Colonies ramified in one plane.................................................................... 3 2’ Colonies ramified in more than one plane........................................................... 4 3 Colonies with pinnate or alternate branching........................................ Stephanogorgia rattoi 3’ Colonies with dichotomous branching............................................................. 7 4 Body wall sclerites longitudinaly arranged.......................................................... 5 4’ Body wall sclerites transversely arranged............................................................ 6 5 From 1 to 3 nodes per branch, distance between branches 1.0– 1.5 mm, body wall of polyps with rotund rods evenly warted and usually rounded ends (cucumber shape), coenenchymal scales with few and sparse warts................................................................................ Chrysogorgia elegans (Fig. 2 G) 5’ From 3 to 6 nodes per branch, distance between branches is 2.0–8.0 mm, body walls of polyps with spindles with big and sparse warts and usually acute ends, coenenchymal scales evenly warted.......................................................................................... Chrysogorgia tuberculata sp. nov. (Fig. 2 B) 6 Body wall of polyps with cylindrical spindles, rarely exceeding 0.06 mm in width............................................................................................. Chrysogorgia fewkesii (Fig. 2 C,E) 6’ Body wall of polyps with flattened spindles, up to 0.13 mm in width............ Chrysogorgia multiflora (Fig. 2 F) 7 Spindles absent, dichotomous colonies, with terminal branches reaching or exceeding half-height of one completely developed colony........................................................... Trichogorgia braziliensis 7’ Spindles present, dichotomous colonies, with short terminal branches.... Chrysogorgia upsilonia sp. nov. (Fig. 2 A,D)

Published as part of Cordeiro, Ralf T. S., Castro, Clovis B. & Pérez, Carlos D., 2015, Deep-water octocorals (Cnidaria: Octocorallia) from Brazil: Family Chrysogorgiidae Verrill, 1883, pp. 81-100 in Zootaxa 4058 (1) on pages 97-98, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4058.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/241598

Keywords

Cnidaria, Chrysogorgiidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Alcyonacea, Anthozoa, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2