Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This document provides recommendations for the better implementation of open science in the Faculty of Science (University of Helsinki). Recommendation 1: Set the overall faculty policy on science products: “as open as possible, as closed as necessary” Recommendation 2: Value the open science products in the staff annual development discussions Recommendation 3: Consider open science products in unit, department and tenure track evaluations Recommendation 4: Require listing of Open Science Products in recruiting Recommendation 5: Create a short, clear and well documented knowledge base of open science best practices in the faculty Recommendation 6: Organise structured staff training on the best practices, facilitate peer support, and open science culture in the Faculty Recommendation 7: Develop open science content for curriculum MSc and Doctoral programs
open software, open science, open science recommendation, open data
open software, open science, open science recommendation, open data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 69 | |
| downloads | 19 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts