This paper proposes a preliminary theoretical framework for addressing foundational questions about human origin, consciousness, and identity from the perspective of evolutionary systems dynamics and information physics. Rather than synthesizing existing traditions — mystical, scientific, theological, or rational — the text operates as an architectural reading of recurrent structural patterns common to all of them. The central argument is that each tradition functions as a subspace of the observable field: internally coherent, capable of generating valid answers within its own framework, but incapable of accessing the invariants that only become visible from an integration function that contains them. The paper formalizes a five-priority operational hierarchy (survive, protect, relate, recognize, evolve) as the structural primitive underlying human behavior across all scales, and uses this hierarchy to reread canonical episodes — the descent from the tree, the partition of Babel, the plural creator of Genesis, the recurrence of the savior archetype, the destruction of Alexandria — not as historical events but as instances of the same systemic mechanism observed at different scales. Consciousness is defined as the condition in which a system includes itself as an active variable within its own field model. The origin and end of existence are identified as structural limits of the observer, not epistemological gaps. The question "Who am I?" is recast as the engine that keeps the observation function open rather than a question with a static answer. The paper explicitly acknowledges the Second-Order Observation problem: any framework that claims to operate from an integration function risks being the most sophisticated submodel in the neighborhood. This tension is declared as the hardest question the framework opens about itself. The text concludes with a set of second-order questions — on simultaneous attractor convergence, on the contemporary equivalent of Alexandria, on what goals a fully self-mapped system generates — that define the program for subsequent work.