Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Defoliation of Sugarbeet: Effect on Root Yield and Quality

Authors: G. F. Stallknecht; K. M. Gilbertson;

Defoliation of Sugarbeet: Effect on Root Yield and Quality

Abstract

A three-year study was conducted to evaluate the effect of defoliation on the yield and quality of sugarbeet grown in south central Montana. Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants were subjected to a single defoliation of 30, 60, or 100% on six dates from July 1 through September 16 in 1991, and seven dates from June 12 and 15 through September 12 and 10 in 1992 and 1993 respectively. Root yield, sucrose content (with the exception of 60% defoliation on July 29, 1993), and sucrose yield (with the exception of 60% defoliation on July 9,1992) were not significantly reduced by 30 or 60% defoliation over the three year study or by 100% defoliation at the mid-June dates in 1992 and 1993. ()ne hundred percent defoliation in late June or early July, mid-July, in mid-August, or in mid-September reduced sugarbeet root yield by an average of 23, 27, 20 and 10%, respectively, averaged over the three-year period. Sucrose content was significantly reduced by 100% defoliation later in the season, from mid-August through mid-September in each year ol the study. Sucrose yield as affected by root yield, sucrose content or both, was significantly reduced by 100% defoliation from late June or July through mid-September in 1991 and 1993, and from late June through August 28 in 1992. Defoliation did not affect sucrose loss to molasses or percent root tare.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!