
doi: 10.5244/c.12.75
Autocalibration is a difficult problem. Not only is its computation very noisesensitive, but there also exist many critical motions that prevent the estimation of some of the camera parameters. When a ?stratified? approach is considered, affine and Euclidean calibration are computed in separate steps and it is possible to see that a part of these ambiguities occur during affine-to- Euclidean calibration. This paper studies the affine-to-Euclidean step in detail using the real Jordan decomposition of the infinite homography. It gives a new way to compute the autocalibration and analyzes the effects of critical motions on the computation of internal parameters. Finally, it shows that in some cases, it is possible to obtain complete calibration in the presence of critical motions.
Autocalibration, critical motions, affine calibration, [INFO.INFO-GR] Computer Science [cs]/Graphics [cs.GR], infinite homography, real Jordan decomposition
Autocalibration, critical motions, affine calibration, [INFO.INFO-GR] Computer Science [cs]/Graphics [cs.GR], infinite homography, real Jordan decomposition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
