
This study aimed to consider whether there was a significant difference in speaking skill between students who were taught using the Mingle game and those who were not. This research was conducted using a quasi-experimental design. The sample consisted of two groups: X MIPA 2 (experimental group) and X MIPA 3 (control group), which were chosen using a purposive sampling process. The data collection were used an oral test. The t-test was used to evaluate the results. The outcome of the independent sample t-test indicated that tobtained (3.96) was higher than the critical value of ttable (1.99), indicating that the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. It was determined that there was a significant difference in speaking ability between students who were taught using the Mingle game and those who were not
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
