
doi: 10.5209/inge.58301
El objetivo del ensayo es analizar los pasajes de la obra cartesiana que pueden ser relacionados con el problema de las otras mentes. Luego de una breve presentación del problema y de lo que se conoce como argumento analógico, se muestra que lo que llamaremos pasaje de los autómatas no es un reconocimiento del problema. Seguido, se invoca una forma de generar el problema, para mostrar una vía mediante la cual se le podría dar respuesta siguiendo la obra cartesiana.
The aim of the essay is to analyze the passages of the Cartesian oeuvre which could be related to the problem of other minds. After a brief presentation of the problem and what is known as the argument from analogy, we show that what we will call the automata passage is not an acknowledgement of the problem. Next, we raise a way of generating the problem, to show how it could be approached from Descartes’s works.
automaton, argumento analógico, argument from analogy, hombre., Descartes, man., autómata
automaton, argumento analógico, argument from analogy, hombre., Descartes, man., autómata
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
