Study and Performance Comparison of Geocross and GPSR

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 18 Jun 2015Publisher:Foundation of Computer ScienceJournal:International Journal of Computer Applications, volume 119, pages 33-36 (eissn: 0975-8887,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Bankat M.Patil; Mandar R.Pandharpurkar;

doi: 10.5120/21145-4211

Study and Performance Comparison of Geocross and GPSR

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

In this paper, we compared Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing protocol(GPSR), a position-based routing which forwards a packet to an immediate neighbor, a greedy mode with Geocross, an event-driven geographic routing which removes cross-links dynamically to avoid routing loops in urban vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET), where the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) is consistently higher in Geocross and packet loss ratio is lower in Geocross than the GPSR.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average