Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Photochemical and non-photochemical responses of glasshouse-grown grape to combined light and water stress

Authors: Düring, H.;

Photochemical and non-photochemical responses of glasshouse-grown grape to combined light and water stress

Abstract

Riesling and Müller-Thurgau vines cultivated in a glasshouse at maximal 400 µmol quanta·m-2s-1 were exposed to water logging and subsequently to decreasing soil moisture contents (SMC) until severe drought stress occurred. In the course of the daily applied light treatments, consisting of stepwise increases of light intensity from 0 to 3200 µmol·m-2s-1 with intermittent stabilisation phases, the Fv/Fm of dark-adapted and the Fv/F'm ratios of light-adapted leaves were determined by chlorophyll fluorescence measure ments. At moderate SMC (21 %) quantum yield of PSII (Y) of Muller-Thurgau leaves decreased when photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) increased beyond 400 µmol·m-2s-1. Water stress (water logging and drought) led to a more precipitous decrease, indicating an increased sensitivity of Y to the combined stresses. The deviation of the electron transport rates from (theoretical) maximum quantum yield ("excessive PAR") increased with increasing PAR and was higher in water-stressed than in moderately irrigated vines. Nonphotochemical quenching started to increase at relatively low PAR (400 µmol·m-2s-1) and reached saturation at 1600 µmol·m-2s-1; values were higher in water-stressed vines than in moderately irrigated vines. Riesling and Müller-Thurgau vines showed photoinhibition of photosynthesis at high PAR; water logging and drought intensified this tendency. The extent of photoinhibition was higher in Müller-Thurgau than in Riesling leaves. Even under most severe stress conditions photoinhibition was transient, suggesting complete overnight repair of PSII in both varieties.

VITIS - Journal of Grapevine Research, Vol. 37 No. 1 (1998): Vitis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!