
doi: 10.5070/b5.36364
This paper examines differences between first- and second-language reading strategies as well as differences between English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading strategies. Two versions of the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) (Sheorey and Mokhtari, 2001) were distributed to 396 learners of English. Two hundred sixty of the learners were studying EFL at the Centro Cultural Costarricense Norteamericano (CCCN) in San José, Costa Rica. The remaining 136 were studying in an ESL environment at the English Language Center (ELC) at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. The first version of the SORS asked the respondents to answer the questions based on their use of metacognitive reading strategies in their L1. The second version asked them to respond to the questions based on their use of metacognitive reading strategies in their L2. Participants also completed a background questionnaire. Similarities and differences between learners’ use of reading strategies in their first and second languages as well as similarities and differences between the instructional environments are addressed. The results of this study provide helpful insights for teachers of reading to improve classroom instruction.
370, 400
370, 400
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
