
pmid: 1827953
Abstract Persons with disabilities are devalued by society. Occupational therapists may be contributing to this devaluation through their attitudes. This study focused on the attitudes of undergraduate students. From a sample of 223 occupational therapy students and 326 business students at an Australian university, it was found, with the use of the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale–Form A (Yuker, Block, & Young, 1966), that the attitudes of freshman occupational therapy students did not differ significantly from those of their business-major peers. Furthermore, the occupational therapy students’ attitudes did not vary with the years of undergraduate education completed. However, those students who had had contact with persons with disabilities beyond the context of a caregiver–care receiver relationship (i.e., those students who had assumed roles that emphasized valued attributes of the person with a disability) had significantly more positive attitudes than did those students without such contact. Educational curricula must address the issue of students’ attitudes and, in particular, the facilitation of valued social role contact with persons with disabilities.
360, Male, education, Persons with Disabilities, Social Values, Universities, Attitude of Health Personnel, Socialization, Australia, Role, Professional-Patient Relations, FoR 1117 (Public Health and Health Services), 3600 Health Professions, 2742 Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, FoR 1103 (Clinical Sciences), Surveys and Questionnaires, handicapped, values, Humans, Female, Students
360, Male, education, Persons with Disabilities, Social Values, Universities, Attitude of Health Personnel, Socialization, Australia, Role, Professional-Patient Relations, FoR 1117 (Public Health and Health Services), 3600 Health Professions, 2742 Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, FoR 1103 (Clinical Sciences), Surveys and Questionnaires, handicapped, values, Humans, Female, Students
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 60 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
