Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ HRČAK - Portal of Cr...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Veterinarska stanica
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cefacetrile and Rifaximin association might improve first service conception rate and reduce the number of services per conception in cows with clinical endometritis

Kombinacija cefacetrila i rifaksimina može poboljšati postotak prvog uspješnog osjemenjivanja i smanjiti broj osjemenjivanja po koncepciji u krava s kliničkim endometritisom
Authors: Boudelal, Saleh; Adnane, Mounir; Niar, Abdelatif;

Cefacetrile and Rifaximin association might improve first service conception rate and reduce the number of services per conception in cows with clinical endometritis

Abstract

Klinički endometritis (CE) jedna je od glavnih značajnih bolesti koja dovodi do lošeg reproduktivnog učinka mliječnih krava u laktaciji, a time smanjujući profitabilnost farme. Da bi se sačuvala optimalna reproduktivna učinkovitost, predložene su različite moguće strategije i terapijski pristupi za krave s CE-om, često s kontradiktornim rezultatima. Iz tog je razloga istraživanje novih načina liječenja CE-a ekonomski bitno. Cilj ove studije bio je ispitati učinkovitost tri različita terapijska protokola na postotak kliničkog izlječenja CE-a te poboljšanje reproduktivne učinkovitosti. Krave (n=42), na 21.-38. dan laktacije (DIM), s CE-om raspoređene su u tri terapijske skupine; PGF: krave (n=19) su sistematski liječene s dvije doze d-kloprostenola, sintetičkog analoga PGF2α, 14-dnevni interval; CEFAX: krave (n=10) su primale intrauterinu infuziju kombinacije antibiotika cefacetrila i rifaksimina; NAX: krave (n=13) su primale sistemsku terapiju s ceftiofur kristaliničnom slobodnom kiselinom (CCFA). Trideset i šest (n=36) krava bez CE-a (zdrava skupina: HE) uključeno je kao kontrolna skupina. Sve krave su ponovno klinički pregledane nakon kraja protokola liječenja. Postotak kliničkog izlječenja iznosio je 73,7 %, 80 % i 69,2 % u PGF, CEFAX, odnosno NAX skupini (P>0,05). HE skupina imala je značajno kraći interval između teljenja do prvog osjemenjivanja u usporedbi s CEFAX i PGF skupinama (P0,05). CEFAX protokol rezultirao je kraćim, ali ne statistički značajnim CFI u usporedbi s PGF i NAX protokolima. Indeks osjemenjivanja po koncepciji bio je nešto niži (1,7) u CEFAX skupini u usporedbi s HE (1,75), PGF (1,84) i NAX (2,23) skupinama, međutim razlika nije bila značajna između sve četiri skupine. Postotak prvog uspješnog osjemenjivanja i postotak koncepcije na 105. DIM nisu se statistički razlikovale među terapijskim skupinama. Premda razlika nije bila značajna, CEFAX protokol imao je nešto bolji postotak izlječenja za CE, smanjujući broj osjemenjivanja po koncepciji i potičući ponovnu aktivnost jajnika nakon teljenja. Validacija ovog otkrića na većem krdu poboljšat će točnost ovih rezultata.

Clinical endometritis (CE) is a serious disease leading to poor reproductive performances in lactating dairy cows, thus diminishing farm profitability. To preserve optimum reproductive efficiency, various strategies and therapeutic approaches have been proposed to manage cows with CE, often with contradictory results. Thus, investigating new paths to CE treatment is economically important. The aim of the present study was to test the efficacy of three therapeutic protocols on the clinical cure rate of CE, and improvement of reproductive performance. Cows with CE (n=42), 21–38 days in milk (DIM), were assigned to three treatment groups: PGF: cows (n=19) were treated systemically with two doses of d-cloprostenol, a PGF2α analogue, at 14-days intervals; CEFAX: cows (n=10) received an intrauterine infusion of the combined antibiotics Cefacetrile and Rifaximin; and NAX: cows (n=13) received systemic treatment with Ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA). A control group included cows (n=36) free from CE (healthy group: HE). All cows were clinically re-examined after the end of the treatment protocol. The clinical cure rate was 73.7%, 80% and 69.2% in PGF, CEFAX, and NAX groups, respectively (P>0.05). The HE group had a significantly shorter calving to first service interval compared to CEFAX and PGF groups (P0.05). CEFAX protocol resulted in shorter but not statistically significant CFI, compared to the PGF and NAX protocols. Services per conception rate were slightly lower (1.7) in the CEFAX group compared to HE (1.75), PGF (1.84) and NAX (2.23) groups, however these differences were not significant. First service conception rate and conception rate at 105 DIM did not differ statistically between the treatment groups. While the difference was not significant, CEFAX protocol had slightly better cure rate for CE, reducing the number of services per conception and boosting the resumption of ovarian activity after calving. Validating these finding on a larger herd size will improve the accuracy of these findings.

Country
Croatia
Related Organizations
Keywords

treatment, clinical endometritis, postotak izlječenja, liječenje, cure rate, reproduktivna učinkovitost, klinički endometritis, reproductive performance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold