
arXiv: 2112.09387
This paper studies the algorithms for the minimisation of weighted automata. It starts with the definition of morphisms-which generalises and unifies the notion of bisimulation to the whole class of weighted automata-and the unicity of a minimal quotient for every automaton, obtained by partition refinement. From a general scheme for the refinement of partitions, two strategies are considered for the computation of the minimal quotient: the Domain Split and the Predecesor Class Split algorithms. They correspond respectivly to the classical Moore and Hopcroft algorithms for the computation of the minimal quotient of deterministic Boolean automata. We show that these two strategies yield algorithms with the same quadratic complexity and we study the cases when the second one can be improved in order to achieve a complexity similar to the one of Hopcroft algorithm.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, [INFO.INFO-DM] Computer Science [cs]/Discrete Mathematics [cs.DM], Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM), Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL), Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory, Formal languages and automata, [INFO.INFO-FL] Computer Science [cs]/Formal Languages and Automata Theory [cs.FL], Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
FOS: Computer and information sciences, [INFO.INFO-DM] Computer Science [cs]/Discrete Mathematics [cs.DM], Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM), Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL), Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory, Formal languages and automata, [INFO.INFO-FL] Computer Science [cs]/Formal Languages and Automata Theory [cs.FL], Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
