
Recent years witnessed a growing interest in non-standard epistemic logics of knowing whether, knowing how, knowing what, knowing why and so on. The new epistemic modalities introduced in those logics all share, in their semantics, the general schema of $\exists x \Box ϕ$, e.g., knowing how to achieve $ϕ$ roughly means that there exists a way such that you know that it is a way to ensure that $ϕ$. Moreover, the resulting logics are decidable. Inspired by those particular logics, in this work, we propose a very general and powerful framework based on quantifier-free predicate language extended by a new modality $\Box^x$, which packs exactly $\exists x \Box$ together. We show that the resulting language, though much more expressive, shares many good properties of the basic propositional modal logic over arbitrary models, such as finite-tree-model property and van Benthem-like characterization w.r.t.\ first-order modal logic. We axiomatize the logic over S5 frames with intuitive axioms to capture the interaction between $\Box^x$ and know-that operator in an epistemic setting.
In Proceedings TARK 2017, arXiv:1707.08250
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA1-939, QA75.5-76.95, Mathematics, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA1-939, QA75.5-76.95, Mathematics, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
