Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Respiratory Carearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Respiratory Care
Article . 2021
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Methacholine Challenge Testing: Comparison of FEV 1 and Airway Resistance Parameters

Authors: Tomasz, Urbankowski; Tadeusz, Przybyłowski;

Methacholine Challenge Testing: Comparison of FEV 1 and Airway Resistance Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 20% reduction in the FEV 1 is routinely used as an end point for methacholine challenge testing (MCT). Measurement of FEV 1 is effort dependent, and some patients are not able to perform acceptable and repeatable forced expiration maneuvers. The goal of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic value of airway resistance measurement by forced oscillation technique (FOT), body plethysmography, and interrupter technique compared with the traditionally accepted standard FEV 1 measurement in evaluating the responsiveness to methacholine during MCT. METHODS: We included in the study adult subjects referred for MCT because of asthma-like symptoms and with normal baseline spirometry. We modified routine MCT protocol by adding the assessment of airway resistance to the measurement of FEV 1 at each step of MCT. RESULTS: We observed, in the subjects with airway hyper-responsiveness versus those with normal airway responsiveness, a significantly greater percentage change in median (interquartile range) FOT resistance at 10 Hz (25.9% [13.7%–35.4%] vs 16% [15.7%–27.2%]), plethysmographic resistance (70.2% [39.5%–116.3%] vs 37.1% [23.9%–81.9%]), and mean ± SD conductance (−41.3 ± 15.4% vs −29.6 ± 15.9%); and a significantly greater change in mean ± SD FOT reactance at 10 Hz (–0.41 ± 0.48 cm H 2 O/L/s vs –0.09 ± 0.32 cm H 2 O/L/s) and at 15 Hz (–0.29 ± 0.2 cm H 2 O/L/s vs –0.1 ± 0.19 cm H 2 O/L/s). We also recorded significant differences in airway resistance parameters (FOT resistance at 10 Hz, FOT reactance at 15 Hz, plethysmographic airway resistance, and conductance indices as well as interrupter resistance) in FEV 1 non-responders at the onset of respiratory symptoms during MCT compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of airway resistance could possibly be used as an alternative method to spirometry in airway challenge. Significant changes in airway mechanics during MCT are detectable by airway resistance measurement in FEV 1 non-responders with methacholine-induced asthma-like symptoms. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02343419.)

Country
Poland
Keywords

Adult, Spirometry, Airway Resistance, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Methacholine Chloride

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!