
arXiv: math/0702630
We prove a quantitative version of the following statement. Given a Lipschitz function f from the k-dimensional unit cube into a general metric space, one can be decomposed f into a finite number of BiLipschitz functions f|_{F_i} so that the k-Hausdorff content of f([0,1]^k\smallsetminus \cup F_i) is small. We thus generalize a theorem of P. Jones [Lipschitz and bi-Lipschitz functions. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 4 (1988), no. 1, 115–121] from the setting of \mathbb{R}^d to the setting of a general metric space. This positively answers problem 11.13 in “Fractured Fractals and Broken Dreams” by G. David and S. Semmes, or equivalently, question 9 from “Thirty-three yes or no questions about mappings, measures, and metrics” by J. Heinonen and S. Semmes. Our statements extend to the case of coarse Lipschitz functions.
Length, area, volume, other geometric measure theory, Sard's theorem, metric space, Metric Geometry (math.MG), Metric geometry, uniform rectifiability, 51F99, Mathematics - Metric Geometry, Mathematics - Classical Analysis and ODEs, Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA), FOS: Mathematics, 28A75, 28a75, Lipschitz, Nontrigonometric harmonic analysis, bi-Lipschitz, 42C99
Length, area, volume, other geometric measure theory, Sard's theorem, metric space, Metric Geometry (math.MG), Metric geometry, uniform rectifiability, 51F99, Mathematics - Metric Geometry, Mathematics - Classical Analysis and ODEs, Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA), FOS: Mathematics, 28A75, 28a75, Lipschitz, Nontrigonometric harmonic analysis, bi-Lipschitz, 42C99
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
