
In a Note in this Monthly, Klazar raised the question of whether the alternating sum of the Stirling numbers of the second kind $B^\pm(n)=\sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^kS(n,k)$ is ever zero for $n\neq 2$. In this article, we present an exposition of the history of this problem, and an economical account of a recent proof that there is at most one $n\neq 2$ for which $B^\pm(n)=0$.
19 page, 1 figure
11B73, Mathematics - Number Theory, FOS: Mathematics, Number Theory (math.NT)
11B73, Mathematics - Number Theory, FOS: Mathematics, Number Theory (math.NT)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
