Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Bratislava Medical J...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Bratislava Medical Journal
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Gastric intestinal metaplasia – age, ethnicity and surveillance for gastric cancer

Authors: V, Simko; N, Anand; E, Ginter;

Gastric intestinal metaplasia – age, ethnicity and surveillance for gastric cancer

Abstract

Determine the prevalence and distribution of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) in a large cohort of patients subjected to esophagogastroscopy (EGD). Evaluate usefulness of grading the severity of gastritis, GIM and the impact of Helicobacter pylori (HP). Define the population at risk for gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) and assess the value of surveillance.In the course of 19 years, we performed 11,600 sequential EGDs in male veterans at Brooklyn, New York. Of all patients, 47 % had EGD only one time while 53 % had EGD repeated, 11 % of these had four or more EGDs. Patients with GIM were matched with equal number of controls with no GI symptoms. All gastric biopsies were processed in one laboratory, using the standardized protocol for histological staining and for grading the severity of epithelial changes.Of all patients subjected to EGD, 354 (3.05 %) were diagnosed with GIM. Compared to controls, GIM patients were older, 80 % were over 71. Regarding ethnicity, GIM was 5.4 % more frequent in 177 African Americans than in 159 Caucasians. Distribution of GIM did not differ with respect to age or ethnicity. As many as 6 %of GIM cases were diagnosed with GC. Grading of GIM severity had a predictive value, the average grade of severity in GC was 50 % higher than in non-cancer patients with GIM. Severity of gastritis was also a useful biomarker: patients with GC had more severe gastritis. Surprisingly, HP positivity had no predictive value: HP positive patients had similar distribution of GIM as the HP negative patients. Use of proton pump inhibitors in the past was unknown.Prevalence of GC in patients with GIM was more than 200 times higher than reported in normal population. Age more than 70 years and African Americans appeared to be at higher risk. Routine EGD and histological diagnosis, with simple grading of severity of epithelial changes provides a useful predictive information. Individuals with upper GI symptoms undergoing EGD with gastric biopsy benefited from routine clinical screening for GC. Patients with higher severity of GIM should enter surveillance (Tab. 1, Fig. 10, Ref. 45).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Metaplasia, Comorbidity, Middle Aged, United States, White People, Helicobacter Infections, Black or African American, Age Distribution, Risk Factors, Stomach Neoplasms, Gastritis, Population Surveillance, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Precancerous Conditions, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold