
doi: 10.4057/jsr.3.3_39
The economic structure of a feudal society is built on the communal organization of production. Roughly speaking, this organization is divided into village and urban communities, but, logically and historically, the former is the origin of such organization. In Japan, tribe, kumi and family have been studied particularly by sociologists. The problem of community (Gemeinde) has been taken up by historians; especially those of European history. How should the results of these two fields of study be correlated? Many people are aware of this problem, but no satisfactory progress has yet been made in this direction. The present article seeks to promote the union of these two in studying the Village community (Dorfgemeinde) as a type; and it tries to grasp the meaning of Flurzwang (regulation of culture) and to apply the concept by comparing three villages at the foot of Mt. Kitesakutade and their methods of regulating irrigation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
