
doi: 10.4037/ccn2015392
pmid: 26232800
BACKGROUNDAlthough critical care nurses gain satisfaction from providing compassionate care to patients and patients’ families, the nurses are also at risk for fatigue. The balance between satisfaction and fatigue is considered professional quality of life.OBJECTIVESTo establish the prevalence of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue in adult, pediatric, and neonatal critical care nurses and to describe potential contributing demographic, unit, and organizational characteristics.METHODSIn a cross-sectional design, nurses were surveyed by using a demographic questionnaire and the Professional Quality of Life Scale to measure levels of compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction.RESULTSNurses (n = 221) reported significant differences in compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue on the basis of sex, age, educational level, unit, acuity, change in nursing management, and major systems change.CONCLUSIONSUnderstanding the elements of professional quality of life can have a positive effect on work environment. The relationship between professional quality of life and the standards for a healthy work environment requires further investigation. Once this relationship is fully understood, interventions to improve this balance can be developed and tested.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, 610, Nurses, Nursing, Personal Satisfaction, Middle Aged, Critical Care Nursing, Hospitals, Pediatric, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, fsc2015, Compassion Fatigue, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, 610, Nurses, Nursing, Personal Satisfaction, Middle Aged, Critical Care Nursing, Hospitals, Pediatric, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, fsc2015, Compassion Fatigue, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 242 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
