Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Japanese Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Analysis of Accidents on Head-feeding combine harvesters with Questionnaire Survey for Japanese Farmers

農業者アンケート調査結果に基づいた自脱コンバインの事故分析
Authors: Muneki TOMITA; Tomomichi MIZUKAMI; Shigeyoshi TSUKAMOTO;

Analysis of Accidents on Head-feeding combine harvesters with Questionnaire Survey for Japanese Farmers

Abstract

To identify potential safety improvements to combine harvesters, the present study analyzes survey data regarding accidents involving combines. A questionnaire survey was completed by 902 Japanese farmers who had been involved in combine harvester accidents; the respondents were from 23 different prefectures. The questionnaire included items such as degree of injury, cause of accident, and machinery operation conditions. The survey results found 257 accidents, including 134 injuries and two fatalities. The data include specific accident causes for 242 cases. According to the results, 65% of combine accidents were caused by contact with processing parts such as the cutter, feeding chain, or conveyer belt, while 29% were caused by the combine rolling over. In the former cases, 60% of victims were seriously injured and either visited or were admitted to a hospital; roughly 2/3 of these serious cases stemmed, at least in part, from a deliberate deviation from safe operating procedures. Both fatalities reported were caused by combines rolling over, but no one was injured in 80% of the rolling accidents reported. The most common occurrences of combines rolling over included combines rolling off transport trailers or rolling off gangways connected to truck platforms. More accidents occurred while transporting combines than during operation. These results suggest that equipment improvements to harvester combines that prohibit deliberate deviations from safety procedures as well as improvements to avoid machinery rolling over are required. Language: ja

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Top 10%
Average
gold