
The manuscript Avranches, Bibliothèque patrimoniale, 159 is an extraordinary piece of evidence for the writing of universal chronicles in twelfth century Normandy. It contains the “working-copy” of the chronicle of Robert of Torigni (1106-1186), abbot of Mont Saint-Michel, an update and continuation of the universal chronicle of Sigibert of Gembloux (1030-1112). The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the visual and textual features that make Avranches 159 Robert of Torigni’s Liber Chronicorum. With his chronography, Robert of Torigni aimed to join the authoritative Eusebius-Jeromian tradition of chronicle-writing. Whilst maintaining the visual unity of the manuscript, Robert altered its chronographic structure to include the Anglo-Saxon and the Anglo-Norman past as the realization of the divine plan. As contextualized in the visual totality of Avranches 159, Robert of Torigni’s chronography appears as a sophisticated textual project that aimed to integrate Henry II’s dynastic past into universal history to enhance the legitimacy of the English king.
Normandy, Henry II, England, Robert of Torigni, Medieval history, Medieval Historiography, D111-203, Universal Chronicles
Normandy, Henry II, England, Robert of Torigni, Medieval history, Medieval Historiography, D111-203, Universal Chronicles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
