
doi: 10.4000/16eas
This article presents a cultural and media analysis of failure in its dialectical relationship with success, emphasizing the relative, frequently changeable and highly context-sensitive nature of the notion of failure. Aiming to offer a broad overview of the questions and based on a survey of the available literature, it opens on a general discussion of the status of failure in modern art and literature. It then proposes a general framework describing the three main aspects of the contemporary “fail better” aesthetics: antihero (content), antistyle (form), antitext (discursive framing). In a third and last part, the various tools and hypotheses are tested with a case study: three works by comics artist Daniel Clowes.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
