
doi: 10.4000/15a5m
The trade network originating from Chios and Phocaea between the fourth and the seventh century A.D. will be used as a case study to analyze the many differences between data provided respectively by written and archaeological sources in the field of history of trade. Evidence provided by the two disciplines appear to be complementary under many points of view. Therefore, in a methodological perspective both sets of data have to be used, in order to obtain a clearer description of trade in a given period of time.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
